The ultimate aim of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is to create a One World Socialist system and make the United States an official part of it.
— Senator Dan Smoot
Joseph McCarthy was correct, in fact he radically underestimated the communist a Soviet influence within the American government at its highest levels, including FDR, in the 1930s onward to his demise into alcohol and depression after the counterattack of the cultural and political elites destroyed him. The subsequent branding of McCarthyism in its’ truest sense should be, for all patriotic Americans a badge of honour, not a conversation stopping pejorative.
Rather than pontificate on the real dangers of the powerful network of socialist/communist and internationalists that permeate our elites in higher education, the government, the mainstream press and now all the way down to the elementary educational levels, I will leave that to you, the reader, to do your research, at least for todays post.
You may want to start with John Coleman’s book quoted below, as well as, the truly excellent book by Dianne West, also quoted below. Just for starters, as the Dodd report, though incredibly revealing of the communist, subversive policies of our major foundations, it is a ponderous tome.
However, there is overwhelming evidence in the public record that the Fabian, Marxist, Socialist and all of its various derivatives and the memes that have infected America and the entirety of Western Civilization and the intellectual, educational and political discourse, is overwhelming our foundational principles, destroying our system of rule by law, as well as, all the moral, ethical and religious ideals that allowed America to be the freest and most productive nation on earth, a position we are rapidly losing.
Despite our many foibles and sins, correcting them is an evolutionary process, as it has been since 1776, not a revolutionary one driven by rigid intolerance of dissent. Communism, Socialism, Fascism are all part of the same circle and they share the same mantle of death, slavery and cultural obliteration.
Congressional Record, Senate, May 31, 1924, we find the Socialists and Communists aims spelled out even more plainly: “In short, American Communists themselves admit that it is impossible to promote revolution in this country unless the rights of the States are destroyed, and a centralized bureaucracy, under an entrenched cast of bureaucrats similar to those in Europe, for Communists (and Socialists) the basic conditions for revolution.”
John Dewey, Professor of Philosophy at Columbia University, New York. Dewey became known as the father of progressive (Socialist) education, identified with Marxist bodies such as the League of Industrial Democracy (LID), of which he was a president. The Un-American Committee cited Dewey as belonging to 15 Marxist-front organizations. Rockefeller rewarded Dewey by making him Governor of New York and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
National Education Association set forth in their 14th Year Book in 1936, from which position the Socialist educators have never wavered: “We stand for Socializing the individual.”
The general thrust of Socialist “education” is to keep intelligence to a minimum wherever possible, while promoting mediocrity.
The onslaught on American education was directed by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, the premiere brainwashing establishment in the world, and their “educators,” Kurt Lewin, Margaret Meade. H.V. Dicks, Richard Crossman and W.R. Bion. These enemies of the American Republic were unleashed upon an innocent, unsuspecting general public, with disastrous consequences for education.
==One World Order: Socialist Dictatorship (Coleman, John)
It was no witch hunt that led American counterintelligence officials to investigate government employees and others with access to sensitive information for Communist ties … but a rational response to the extent to which the Communist Party had become an appendage of Soviet intelligence. And, as the documents in Vassiliev’s notebooks make plain, they only knew the half of it.37
Their implications being that for many crucial years, American statecraft was an instrument of Soviet strategy.
Washington, D.C., was, yes, a giant hive of Soviet intelligence activity. A massive Communist conspiracy did, in fact, exist. There was indeed a “Red plot against America,” orchestrated by the KGB and related Soviet branches and executed by an extensive network of American traitors.
The mentality—make that the psychosis—of historians, journalists, and opinion makers impervious and hostile to facts. Pages and books and stacks of facts. They are also even more impervious and even more hostile to the logical, often ineluctable implications of these facts, which are devastating to the conventional wisdom and venerated mythology. In this impaired mindset I think we see the ultimate impact of Communist influence, Communist conspiracy. The complete subversion of logic is what it did to us. In this sundering of fact from implication lies the end of Enlightenment thinking, the seedbed of cultural decline, the rise of the godless but nonetheless cultishly religious Left, and the disintegration of a faltering, also damaged Right. Into this same breach between fact and implication, between implication and judgment, has rushed antilogical, contrafactual “political correctness” and also amoral cultural relativism.
==American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character (West, Diana)
The Congressional investigation by the Reece Committee found that these foundations had an interlocking leadership and that they were funding ‘education’ and ‘science’ to advance their Agenda for the centralisation of global power.
==The Biggest Secret: The book that will change the World (Icke, David)
Following the communist takeover of China in 1950, the Senate appointed a special committee to investigate why our State Department placed an arms embargo on the Nationalist Chinese and brought Chairman Mao to power.
The ( congressional Reece) committee also discovered that both the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation funded communist propaganda outlets in the years preceding the fall of China. The 83rd Congress commissioned Congressman Carroll Reece to investigate the tax-exempt foundations to determine why they had financed communist organizations. The Reece Committee discovered:
1. In 1915 the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace launched a propaganda program to force the United States into World War I.
2.Many of our large foundations were actively promoting communism and socialism.
3.The Rockefeller Foundation financed Dr. Alfred Kinsey’s badly flawed study of human sexuality, and his effort to undermine the moral standards of our nation.
4.The Rockefeller Foundation, the Carnegie Educational Foundation, and the Ford Foundation had used their grant-making power to take over American education and force our colleges and universities to abandon their religious beliefs and moral standards.
5.The foundations influenced State Department policy and were largely responsible for bringing communism to China.59 6. The foundations were working to undermine our constitutional form of government.
==Brotherhood of Darkness (Monteith, Dr. Stanley)
The Dodd Report of the findings of the Reece Committee 1954, just one example out of many contained in the work of Norman Dodd of the communist, subversive and anti-American focus of many of this nation’s most prominent tax exempt foundations. It will not come as a surprise that the document produced
THE FORD FOUNDATION
Finally, I suggest that the Committee give special consideration to the Ford Foundation . This Foundation gives ample evidence of having taken the initiative in selecting purposes of its own . Being of recent origin, it should not be held responsible for the actions or accomplishments of any of its predecessors . It is without precedent as to size, and it is the first Foundation to dedicate itself openly “problem solving” on a world scale . In a sense, Ford appears to be capitalizing on developments which took place long before it was founded, and which have enabled it to take advantage of the wholesale dedication of education to a social purpose the need to defend this dedication against criticism the need to indoctrinate adults along these lines the acceptance by the Executive branch of the Federal Government of responsibility for planning on a national and international scale the diminishing importance of the Congress and the states and the growing power of the Executive branch of the Federal government-and the seeming indispensability of control over human behavior
It seems incredible that the trustees of typically American for- tune-created foundations should have permitted them to be used to finance ideas and practices incompatible with the fundamental concepts of our Constitution . Yet there seems evidence that this may have occurred.I assume it is the purpose of this inquiry to gather and weigh the facts.
Norman Dodd, Director of Research
SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE
TAX EXEMPT FOUNDATION
Deep State: Follow the Rothschild, Soros, and Rockefeller Money
Written by Alex Newman, The New American Magazine
It may sound cliché, but there is a great deal of wisdom in the old saying about catching criminals: “Follow the money.” That advice applies as much to catching small-time petty thieves as it does to big-time global crime syndicates. And it is especially relevant when trying to understand the bureaucratic and intelligence community components of the “Deep State,” and more importantly, the “Deep State Behind the Deep State.” This shadowy network, which is barely concealed at this point, includes secret societies such as Skull and Bones and the Bohemian Grove, as well as less-secretive organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderbergmeetings. Money is key.
Of course, much of what has been referred to amid the Trump era as the “Deep State” is merely part of the government — the legions of entrenched Big Government bureaucrats and especially the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA), and other secretive agencies. Other analysts have pointed — quite properly — to elements of the Big Business community and Wall Street in particular. Former congressional staffer Mike Lofgren, a top-secret security clearance holder and one of the early voices to develop the idea of a “Deep State” in America, refers to it as “a hybrid entity of public and private institutions ruling the country.” He is right, in a sense, to point at Wall Street. But there is more to the story.
Wall Street and the Deep State
“Washington is the most important node of the Deep State that has taken over America, but it is not the only one,” argued Lofgren, who wrote a book on the subject before Donald Trump became president. “Invisible threads of money and ambition connect the town to other nodes. One is Wall Street, which supplies the cash that keeps the political machine quiescent and operating as a diversionary marionette theater. Should the politicians forget their lines and threaten the status quo, Wall Street floods the town with cash and lawyers to help the hired hands remember their own best interests.”
Wall Street, and especially outfits such as Goldman Sachs, are crucial to this. But the reality is even worse than Lofgren seems to realize. An explosive 2011 Swiss study published in the PLOS ONE journal on the “network of global corporate control,” for instance, highlights the fact that a tiny group of entities — mostly financial institutions and especially central banks — exert a massive amount of influence over the international economy from behind the scenes. According to the peer-reviewed paper, which presented the first global investigation of ownership architecture in the international economy, transnational corporations form a “giant bow-tie structure.” A large portion of control “flows to a small tightly-knit core of financial institutions,” investigators found, describing the core as an “economic super-entity.”
Lofgren was not the first observer to realize or point out that the elected officials ostensibly in charge of governing America are not really in charge. Even close friends and associates of the “Deep State behind the Deep State” have commented on the issue. The late Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley, a mentor to President Bill Clinton, was close to the core of the Deep State all of his life, and, while he disagreed with the secrecy, he admitted to agreeing with most of its aims. He was even allowed to examine their records for a period of time. And then, spilling the proverbial beans, Quigley put some of his explosive findings in his massive 1966 book Tragedy and Hope.
Quigley offered extremely important insight into the agenda, especially the monetary machinations, of the real Deep State. “The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole,” he explained on page 324. “This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.”
Indeed, just as Quigley explained, the world now exists under what could fairly be described as a neofeudalist-type system, and international entities such as the Bank of International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank play key roles in it all. Another crucial component of that involves control of the economy and even the political systems of nations by a tiny clique, which exercises its power quietly through well-connected mega-banks that literally own the central banks. The Federal Reserve, for instance, is essentially a banking cartel, with each regional Federal Reserve bank owned and controlled by its member banks. In court filings, the banks have even boldly declared that laws applicable to government agencies such as transparency requirements do not apply to Fed banks, because they are private corporations.