Imagine a movement so bent on achieving its political objectives that it is willing to corrupt science to meet them. Imagine governments around the globe, first adopting and then promoting this official science for more than two generations. Imagine that they are willing to use their regulatory power to implement a massive program of social engineering in order to “save” the planet. Imagine the United Nations leading this movement and insisting that a global effort is required.
Imagine the movement’s leaders believing that people around the globe must change their eating, heating, cooling, lighting, toilet, transportation, manufacturing, entertainment, even housing habits and reject values that are critical to their prosperity, happiness, and welfare, confident that humans can adapt and revert to simpler, more primitive, more local lifestyles, have fewer children, and embrace lives presumed to be more in harmony with nature.
Imagine thousands of scientists engaged at public expense in developing a convincing rationale for this unprecedented project. Imagine that these scientists are willing to compromise their integrity in pursuit of the role of a single factor that they insist controls the most complex and chaotic earth system, a molecule – carbon dioxide – that is literally the building block of all of life. Imagine that they believe that by reducing its miniscule – .04 percent – presence in the atmosphere, the planet will cool and climate will stabilize at an optimum level, a level seen only in micro-seconds of geological time.
Imagine scientists who dismiss the work of hundreds of their colleagues and believe that their work must be suppressed. Imagine a scientific movement dominated by greedy grant farmers and cheered on by the media, insisting that there is no further need to study the science and that governments need to start implementing its preferred policy of worldwide social engineering. Imagine that many leaders of this movement believe that the world’s population needs to be thinned down to a billion people within a generation or two. Imagine that some of the movement’s most revered leaders, even as they advocate that ordinary people must curb their consumption and live simpler lives, pursue lifestyles that consume more energy and other commodities in a year than an ordinary family of four would need over its lifetime.
Imagine a movement whose leaders habitually dissemble and mislead and justify this on the claimed greater good they are pursuing. Imagine politicians, civil servants, scientists, activists, and the media flying from one exotic location to another as they plan what must be done to coerce changes in our lifestyles, even to the point of sacrificing human freedom and democracy. Most thoughtful people would conclude that only Hollywood could come up with such a bizarre plot. A little more thinking, however, and they might connect the dots.
There is such a movement, and it has demanded our attention for more than thirty years. It has devoured billions of dollars in public money and has inserted its menacing tentacles into every aspect of modern life. The UN and all its organs are the leading force behind it, but most governments of the world support it in one way or another. Elites, the media, and even religious leaders, have embraced it, even though they seem poorly informed and ignore its demands while urging others to adopt sharply reduced lifestyles. The public face of this science, climate science, is part of a worrying new trend: the emergence of “official” or consensus science.
==Hubris: The Troubling Science, Economics, and Politics of Climate Change (Hart, Michael)
Human made climate change is total bullshit. The curtain is being turned back, let us hope before it is too late.
There are so many propaganda driven cultural globalist memes that are crumbling around the world that it would seem virtually impossible for the power elites and the massive bureaucracies of technocratic blood sucking leeches that survive on them to ever be able to put the genie back in the bottle of lies they molded over many years. Certainly impossible without the imposition of far more draconian forms of tyranny and control than the world has suffered under so far.
One of the grandest efforts of attempting to stuff completely false memes has been the globalist fascists destruction of the scientific integrity under the mantra of anthropogenic global warming or climate change. So grand and important has this scheme to redirect global wealth and resources been that it required not only the buying off of generations of climate scientists, the full force of untold millions of man hours of bureaucrats from the United Nations to the EPA and many billions, if not trillions of wasted capital.
The creation of a unifying world religion directed by the technocratic secular humanists of the left has been an important goal since the progressive movements began in Europe and America in the later part of the 19th Century, if not long before in the secret societies of transnational power politics as the Bavarian Illuminati and its progeny. There are only a few things that drive these corrupt elites, the drive for power, the drive for control and the drive for wealth. The only reason for the "climate change" propaganda and threatened coercion of by state powers to enforce its acceptance is to drive the technocratic systems of controls to truly dystopian levels.
However, truth is prevailing. Enhanced or even driven by the internet, designed as the ultimate tool to secure the sovereignty of the individual over the state in the quest for knowledge and freedom, the alternative media has set the stage for the obliteration of the mainstream sources of fake, CIA and State directed "news", that is, if the political elites and the powerful transnational globalist corporations can not find a mechanism to control the freedom of information flows the the internet engenders. Thus, once again, the warning must be made: those who now carry the burden of generations of the hidden hands manipulation towards one goal, total world domination under the umbrella of One World Government, will not relinquish all that has been accomplished to achieve their insidious, evil ends. The death throes of the new world order will not be accomplished without resistance and counter-revolution. At least so history would dictate.
Climate science is supposed to be settled, right?
We are told that there is an overwhelming agreement, or consensus, among scientists that most weather and climate changes that have occurred since the mid-20th century have been caused by human activity — our fossil fuel burning and CO2 emissions in particular. We are told that natural mechanisms that used to dominate are no longer exerting much of any influence on weather or climate anymore. Humans predominantly cause weather and climate changes now.
For example, we are told that extreme weather (hurricanes, droughts, floods, storms) frequencies and intensities have increased since about 1950 primarily due to the dramatic rise in anthropogenic CO2 emissions since then. Humans are now melting glaciers and ice sheets and (Arctic) sea ice at an alarmingly accelerated rate — reminiscent of an impending “death spiral“. Humans now heat up and acidify the oceans down to depths of thousands of meters by burning fossil fuels. Humans are now in the process of raising sea levels so that they will catastrophically rise by 10 feet in the next 50 years. Because of our CO2 emissions, humans are now endangering the long-term survival of 100s of thousands of animal species (especially polar bears), and climate models say we will cause a million species extinctions over the next 33 years with our CO2 emissions. The Earth is even spinning slower, or faster, no, slower, well, faster — due to human activities. Again, this is all settled science. Only those who possess the temerity to deny this science (“climate deniers”) would disagree, or refuse to believe.
But what if much of what we have been told to believe is not actually true? What if scientists do not overwhelmingly agree that humans have dominated (with ~110% attribution) weather and climate changes since about 1950, which is what we have been told by the UN IPCC? What if scientists do not overwhelmingly agree that natural factors exert effectively no influence on weather and climate changes anymore — now that humans have taken over?
Challenging the theory that we are in a period of global warming, a recent report stated that over the last eight months global temperatures have cooled a record 1.2°C.
While the climate change doomsayers constantly harp about global warming, climate blogger Tony Heller reported on November 13 that over the last eight months, global temperatures over land have cooled a record 1.2°C. Heller’s findings were charted on a graph posted on the website realclimatescience.com.
A biographical sketch on the International Conferences on Climate Change website created by the Heartland Institute notes that Heller “has spent much of the past seven years studying the history of extreme weather, as well as the history and methodology behind the reported NOAA/NASA temperature record.” He was one of the speakers at the ninth International Conference on Climate Change held on July 9, 2014 in Las Vegas, delivering a talk titled “The Emperor’s New Climate.”
While this latest report may come as a surprise to many people, longtime readers of The New American will not be among them. Our publication has published numerous reports over the past several years offering evidence that not only are periods of global warming more likely to be the result of natural cyclical changes than human activity, but that the warming process has reversed itself and our Earth may actually have entered a cooling period.
Is The Global-Warming Hustle Finally Falling Apart?
The science is only settled in government circles where leaders have climbed on board the Globalist plan to undermine economies all over the world by grossly lowering energy production, as a way to “reduce warming.”
One of the major warming hustlers is, of course, Al Gore.
Consider facts laid out in an uncritical Washington Post story (October 10, 2012, “Al Gore has thrived as a green-tech investor”):
In 2001, Al was worth less than $2 million. By 2012, it was estimated he’d locked up a nice neat $100 million.
How did he do it? Well, he invested in 14 green companies, who inhaled — via loans, grants and tax relief — somewhere in the neighborhood