What we mean by “Western civilization” may be defined in terms of the continuous development through space and time of an observable social formation that begins (or is revived—the distinction is irrelevant to the present purpose) about the year A.D. 700 in the center of western Europe; in terms of certain distinctive institutions; in terms of certain distinctive beliefs and values, including certain ideas concerning the nature of reality and of man.
Suicide of the West: An Essay on the Meaning and Destiny of Liberalism (Burnham, James)
You [the Roman Senate] have encouraged treason and have opened the gates to free the traitors. A nation can survive its fools, even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. Cicero
Behold, the relics of Rome. Neither time nor the barbarian can boast the merit of this stupendous destruction; it was perpetrated by her own citizens, by the most illustrious of her sons. Petrach
To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism and religious dogmas.… We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certaindes fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our politicians, our priests, our newspapers and others with vested interests in controlling us. The reinterpretadon and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitudon of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of the old people, these are the belated objectives… for charting the changes in human behavior.
In addition to destroying man’s basic loyalties to family, nation and religion, the nation must be conditioned to the belief that less is better than more. The standard of living of those in the affluent nations must be reduced. This will be done by a slow, gradual process of conditioning the citizens of the rich nations to survive on less than they produce.
–Dr. George Brock Chisholm, first Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO)
That [fundamental] task [of UNESCO] is to help the emergence of a single world culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas, and with its own broad purpose. This is opportune, since this is the first time in history that the scaffolding and the mechanisms for world unification have become available, and also the first time that man has had the means (in the shape of scientific discovery and its applications) of laying a world-wide foundation for the minimum physical welfare of the entire human species. And it is necessary, for at the moment two opposing philosophies of life confront each other from the West and from the East, and not only impede the achievement of unity but threaten to become the foci of actual conflict.
You may categorise the two philosophies as two super-nationalisms; or as individualism versus collectivism; or as the American versus the Russian way of life; or as capitalism versus communism; or as Christianity versus Marxism; or in half a dozen other ways. The fact of their opposition remains and the further fact that round each of them are crystallising the lives and thoughts and political aspirations of hundreds of millions of human beings. Can this conflict be avoided, these opposites be reconciled, this antitheses be resolved in a higher syntheses? I believe not only that this can happen, but that, through the inexorable dialectic of evolution, it must happen – only I do not know whether it will happen before or after another war. ==Julian Huxley, brother of Aldous Huxley. (Huxley’s position on eugenics is detailed below in an analysis of several of his most influential publications on eugenics, education, and race: his 1933 paper entitled “The Vital Importance of Eugenics,” his 1946 publication of the goals of UNESCO after becoming the organization’s first director-general.)
Most people when they hear someone speak of the emergent Huxleyan World that is the now , that is our world, think of Aldous Huxley and his dystopian novel, particularly “Brave New World”, that is most of the decreasing number of Americans that can even read. However, the real power in the family lay with Julian, Aldous’s brother. Both were Fabian Socialists, both were secular humanists ( Marx described himself as such) one told us what our future would look like, along with his fellow traveler George Orwell, and the other helped to build the infrastructure that would achieve their shared visions. For in reality, it seems we are really falling into an abyss which has a bit of Orwell’s “1984”, Huxley’s “Brave New World” and Burgess’s “Clockwork Orange”, a description of our future, which is rapidly becoming our present, that I have been forecasting for many years now.
The goal is to destroy the nation-state, to destroy Christianity first, and though the pawns in this game think they are invincible, Islam will come next. The all encompassing World State will not tolerate anything but the one unifying religion and its progeny, Secular Humanism and Environmentalism, which borders on the occult.
Despite the chaos and rise of the right nationalists in Europe and soon America, “they” can not stop, they will not stop. The final battle for the soul of humanity is on, but few can remotely fathom what is really happening here, as terror and chaos, which is bound to accelerate draws our minds to seek the bosom and safety of the State. Exactly as expected, exactly as planned.
The True Cost of Europe’s Muslim “Enrichment”
The United Nations, in 2000, advocated the “replacement” of Europe’s population by Muslim migrants.There seems to be an economic premise underlying this view: that importing the Muslim world en masse into Europe is mutually beneficial.
For decades, the mass immigration of Muslims into Europe has been labelled “enrichment.” Shouting “Islamophobia” does not negate how it is virtually impossible to think of a country actually made richer by it. Even in a country with an established Islamic population such as Britain, Muslim unemployment languishes at 50% for men, and 75% for women.